Q-SCREEN · OECD FDI Screening Regime Comparator — THE Q AGENCY
Q

Q-SCREEN

OECD FDI Screening Regime Comparator · Composite Restrictiveness Console

THE Q AGENCY S.A. · Intelligence-Based Economy
Calibration v0.2 · Anchor regimes verified 07/2026
Indicative analysis — not legal advice
Q-COMPLEXITY →
I.

Composite Screening Restrictiveness — Q-SCR Index

Twelve investment screening regimes scored on five pillars and aggregated into a weighted composite (0–100). Adjust the pillar weights below to test the robustness of the ranking. Select up to three jurisdictions to compare their quinary profiles in Section II.

II.

Quinary Profile — Side-by-Side

The five-pillar structure renders every regime as a pentagon. A larger, more regular pentagon indicates a broad, muscular regime; asymmetry reveals where a regime concentrates its force — scope, triggers, call-in powers, procedure, or enforcement.

III.

Indicative Deal Screener

A first-pass triage signal: given a jurisdiction, target sector, acquirer origin and stake, how likely is the transaction to trigger a mandatory notification? This is a heuristic pre-assessment, not a filing determination.

    Heuristic output from illustrative calibration v0.1. Filing obligations turn on statutory definitions, thresholds, and case-specific facts; formal legal review is required before relying on this signal - no output of this console constitutes a representation before any authority.
    IV.

    Method & Sources

    The five pillars

    Each regime is coded 0–10 on five pillars, aggregated as a weighted mean and rescaled to 0–100 (Q-SCR):

    • P1 - Sectoral scope. Breadth of sectors captured by mandatory or reviewable screening.
    • P2 - Triggers & thresholds. How low the ownership/control thresholds sit and whether notification is mandatory and suspensory.
    • P3 - Call-in & ex-officio powers. Authority's ability to review non-notified deals, including retroactive reach.
    • P4 - Procedural burden. Length and phasing of review, information demands, standstill effects.
    • P5 - Enforcement & remedies. Sanctions for non-filing, unwinding powers, conditions and prohibition practice.

    Lineage

    The composite design follows the approach of Bencivelli et al. (2023, Banca d'Italia / CEPR), the first cross-country composite index of FDI screening restrictiveness, and complements the OECD FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index (2024 series), which deliberately excludes security-motivated screening from its scores. Regime coverage reflects the new Regulation (EU) 2026/1386 (OJ 26 June 2026, applicable 17 January 2028: mandatory national regimes, minimum sectoral scope, 45-day Phase 1, 15-month-to-5-year call-in), national instruments (incl. the UK's March 2026 NARs reform, Germany's pending consolidated FDI Act), and the outbound layer opened by Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/63 and the US OISP (statutory under the FY2026 NDAA).

    Calibration status

    Calibration v0.2 (8 July 2026): the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany are coded against verified primary and Tier-1 sources per memorandum Q-SCR·CAL·2026·01; the remaining nine regimes are held at the 2025 baseline pending the next calibration pass, and the EU-wide P3/P4 shifts under Regulation 2026/1386 will be coded at transposition. Expert legal validation is required before client-facing release (v1.0). The two-register discipline applies: this console encodes structural knowledge (Register S) and carries no client data.